Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
54 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Released April 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the XC10 (1") and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XC10 was launched 2 years after the TG-630 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the XC10 scores vs the TG-630 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon XC10 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon XC10 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| XC10 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 28 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Canon XC10
| TG-630 iHS | XC10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| XC10 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon XC10 features external dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") with a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the XC10 against the TG-630 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XC10 and TG-630 iHS is 54 and 94 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XC10 and TG-630 iHS.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The XC10 has got the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field easier. The younger XC10 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon XC10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon XC10 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2015-04-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC DV5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 122.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 20000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | XF-AVC, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1040g (2.29 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E6N | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $1,599 | $200 |
