Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-3
83 Imaging
38 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus TG-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TG-3 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-10 was introduced 4 months before the TG-3 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-10 matches up against the TG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus TG-3
EX-10 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Casio EX-10
TG-3 | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-3
EX-10 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | March 2014 | Similar age | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 has got external dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-10 vs the TG-3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and TG-3 is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The photograph here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-3 will give you more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 250s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 photos | 330 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-130A | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $456 | $350 |