Casio EX-100 vs Nikon P950
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon P950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Introduced January 2020
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon P950 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-100 versus Nikon P950, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and P950 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and P950 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was introduced 7 years prior to the P950 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-100 grades vs the P950 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon P950 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Nikon Coolpix P950. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Nikon P950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Nikon P950
EX-100 | P950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | 3.2" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 921k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Casio EX-100
P950 | EX-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2020 | February 2014 | More modern by 72 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Nikon P950
EX-100 | P950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon P950 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-100 offers outside measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Nikon P950 has sizing of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") along with a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 versus Nikon P950 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-100 versus the P950.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and P950 is 83 and 52 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon P950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and P950.
All in all, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-100 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Nikon P950 will provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon P950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon P950 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Nikon Coolpix P950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2020-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3.2 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 90 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 300 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389g (0.86 lbs) | 1005g (2.22 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 pictures | 290 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $572 | $797 |