Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
85 Imaging
56 Features
78 Overall
64
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-100 was revealed 5 years earlier than the E-PL9 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-100 matches up vs the E-PL9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus E-PL9
EX-100 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Casio EX-100
E-PL9 | EX-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | February 2014 | More recent by 48 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Clearer display (+118k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus E-PL9
EX-100 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 enjoys outside measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-100 versus the E-PL9.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and E-PL9 is 83 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and E-PL9.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus E-PL9 will provide extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-100 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389 grams (0.86 pounds) | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $572 | $599 |