Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Casio and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and A35 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and A35 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-100 was announced 2 years after the A35 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-100 scores versus the A35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Sony SLT-A35. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Sony A35
| EX-100 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | September 2011 | More modern by 29 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 921k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Casio EX-100
| A35 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Sony A35
| EX-100 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-100 comes with outside dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony A35 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-100 vs the A35.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and A35 is 83 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-100 and A35.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-100 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A35 will give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The younger EX-100 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-100 vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2011-09-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 lbs) | 415g (0.91 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 pictures | 440 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $572 | $598 |