Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VG-145
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-FH25 versus Olympus VG-145, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and VG-145 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was announced 12 months earlier than the VG-145 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-FH25 grades vs the VG-145 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Olympus VG-145. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Olympus VG-145
| EX-FH25 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Casio EX-FH25
| VG-145 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus VG-145
| EX-FH25 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 provides outer dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Olympus VG-145 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 versus Olympus VG-145 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the VG-145.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and VG-145 is 69 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and VG-145.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus VG-145 to show more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2011-07-27 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | 120 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $450 | $0 |
