Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony HX300
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
63 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Launched February 2013
- Replaced the Sony HX200V
- Updated by Sony HX400V
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or MThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the HX300 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the HX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Sony HX300
EX-FH25 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Casio EX-FH25
HX300 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | July 2010 | Newer by 32 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Sony HX300
EX-FH25 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 has got exterior measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Sony HX300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the HX300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and HX300 is 69 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The picture below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and HX300.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony HX300 to offer you greater detail having an extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 623g (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $450 | $339 |