Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Z950
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak Z950, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Z950 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durabilityThe EX-FS10 was announced 17 months earlier than the Z950 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Kodak Z950 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FS10 matches up versus the Z950 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Kodak Z950
EX-FS10 | Z950 |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Casio EX-FS10
Z950 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 17 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak Z950
EX-FS10 | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FS10 has got physical measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FS10 and Kodak Z950 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FS10 versus the Z950.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and Z950 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The pic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and Z950.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Kodak Z950 to provide more detail with its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 1/8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 243g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $200 | $250 |