Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Leica M-E Typ 220, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Leica. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) posses different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-FS10 was announced 4 years prior to the M-E Typ 220 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-FS10 matches up against the M-E Typ 220 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 EX-FS10 M-E Typ 220 

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Casio EX-FS10

 M-E Typ 220 EX-FS10 
AnnouncedSeptember 2012January 2009More recent by 44 months

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Leica M-E Typ 220

 EX-FS10 M-E Typ 220 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.5"2.5"Same screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 features outside dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Leica M-E Typ 220 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Leica M-E Typ 220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FS10 and the M-E Typ 220.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and M-E Typ 220 is 96 and 79 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and M-E Typ 220.

As you have seen, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-FS10 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will offer extra detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography details
Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography details
25
focusing manually
no manual control
external flash not possible
MP count low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
71
manual focus
resolution is good (18MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Street photography camera
Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Street photography camera
47
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
sensor size is big (Full frame)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Sports photography camera
Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Sports photography camera
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,250s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
46
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
no liveview feature
max fps low (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Travel photography highlights
Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography highlights
51
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (9MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
57
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography info
Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography info
26
focusing manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
61
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Vlogging highlights
Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
9
can't shoot video
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-FS10 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Leica M-E Typ 220
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Leica M-E Typ 220
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Leica
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Leica M-E Typ 220
Type Ultracompact Pro Mirrorless
Revealed 2009-01-08 2012-09-17
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 36 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 864.0mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Full resolution 3456 x 2592 5212 x 3472
Max native ISO 1600 2500
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Leica M
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.9-7.1 -
Amount of lenses - 59
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 2.5"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (rangefinder)
Viewfinder magnification - 0.68x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings - Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121 grams (0.27 lbs) 585 grams (1.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 69
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.7
DXO Low light score not tested 787
Other
Battery model NP-80 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $200 $0