Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively close but the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The EX-FS10 was manufactured 14 months prior to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-FS10 matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-FS10 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-FS10

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-FS10 
RevealedMarch 2010January 2009More recent by 14 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-FS10 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Focus manually  Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither has Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 has external measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FS10 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FS10 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 96 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Normally, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-FS10 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
	
			Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography factors
25
 has manual focus
 no manual control
 cannot use external flash
 low MP (9MP)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
36
 focusing manually
 exports RAW files
 doesn't have liveview
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Street Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 Street photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography info
47
 screen does not articulate
 no image stabilization
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lighter than average (355 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography features
16
 maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250 seconds)
 no shutter priority
 no image stabilization
 low MP (9MP)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 doesn't have liveview
 max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
 lacks phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography information
51
 flash built-in
 doesn't have Timelapse recording
 low MP (9MP)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
60
 lighter than average (355g)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 low MP (10 megapixels)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly display
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
26
 has manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
 screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
 no manual control
 no image stabilization
 low MP (9MP)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 doesn't have Timelapse recording
47
 focusing manually
 fairly wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't have liveview
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
 Casio EX-FS10 as a Vlogging camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
22
 wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 no image stabilization
 video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 doesn't have microphone socket
28
 fairly wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average (355 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't posses selfie friendly display
 video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
 does not have mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Casio EX-FS10 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2009-01-08 2010-03-18
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 3456 x 2592 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-7.1 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 seconds 180 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range - 4.50 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 121 grams (0.27 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-80 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $200 $349