Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A200
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Later Model is Sony A230
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A200 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony A200, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and the A200 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FS10 was introduced 6 months later than the A200 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-FS10 grades vs the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sony A200
| EX-FS10 | A200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Casio EX-FS10
| A200 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony A200
| EX-FS10 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 |  | July 2008 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FS10 enjoys external measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the A200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and A200 is 96 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The photograph below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FS10 and A200.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-FS10 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A200 will provide extra detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 572g (1.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $100 |