Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony QX1
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Announced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony QX1, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Lens-style by companies Casio and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FS10 was launched 6 years earlier than the QX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the QX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Sony Alpha QX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sony QX1
| EX-FS10 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.5" |  | " | Larger display (+2.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Casio EX-FS10
| QX1 | EX-FS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 68 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony QX1
| EX-FS10 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FS10 features external dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has sizing of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony QX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the QX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and QX1 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and QX1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-FS10 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony QX1 will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The older EX-FS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | - |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $500 |
