Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
63 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Renewed by Sony HX400V
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-G1 was released 4 years prior to the HX300 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-G1 scores versus the HX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Sony HX300
EX-G1 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Casio EX-G1
HX300 | EX-G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | November 2009 | More modern by 39 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Sony HX300
EX-G1 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 comes with external measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-G1 against the HX300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and HX300 is 94 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and HX300.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Sony HX300 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-11-18 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.40 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 154 grams (0.34 pounds) | 623 grams (1.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-800 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $61 | $339 |