Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Launched June 2009
Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview

Here is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-H10 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-H10 was released 3 years prior to the Easyshare M5370 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-H10 scores against the Easyshare M5370 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 EX-H10 Easyshare M5370 
Focus manually More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-H10

 Easyshare M5370 EX-H10 
LaunchedSeptember 2011June 2009Fresher by 27 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Kodak Easyshare M5370

 EX-H10 Easyshare M5370 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-H10 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H10 against the Easyshare M5370.

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and Easyshare M5370 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and Easyshare M5370.

As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Portrait photography details
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Portrait photography details
27
focusing manually
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
34
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Street photography camera
Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Street photography camera
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Sports photography camera
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
29
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Travel photography camera
57
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
72
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography advice
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography advice
41
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual exposure not available
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
43
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Vlogging info
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging info
28
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic support
32
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen enabled
comes with face detection focus
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Kodak Easyshare M5370
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-H10 Kodak Easyshare M5370
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-06-11 2011-09-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.7 -
Macro focus range 7cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.60 m 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-1, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194g (0.43 pounds) 150g (0.33 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $300 $160