Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H10 was launched 6 years prior to the SH-2 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H10 grades against the SH-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus SH-2
| EX-H10 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Casio EX-H10
| SH-2 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus SH-2
| EX-H10 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H10 vs the SH-2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and SH-2 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and SH-2.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus SH-2 to offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2015-03-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 11.5fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $399 |
