Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H10 was announced 3 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| EX-H10 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-H10
| TG-820 iHS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 32 months |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| EX-H10 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H10 vs the TG-820 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and TG-820 iHS is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you would want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-H10 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $500 |
