Casio EX-H10 vs Panasonic FZ35
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Casio EX-H10 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Casio EX-H10 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-H10 and Panasonic FZ35, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Panasonic. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was unveiled 13 months earlier than the FZ35 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-H10 matches up vs the FZ35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H10 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Panasonic FZ35
EX-H10 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Casio EX-H10
FZ35 | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | June 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Panasonic FZ35
EX-H10 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 offers external dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has measurements of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") having a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 and Panasonic FZ35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 vs the FZ35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and FZ35 is 93 and 72 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specifications. The pic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and FZ35.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of pictures although you should take the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Panasonic |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 397g (0.88 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $999 |