Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Kodak. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and M380 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H15 was unveiled 13 months after the M380 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Kodak M380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-H15 grades against the M380 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Kodak EasyShare M380. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Kodak M380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Kodak M380
| EX-H15 | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Casio EX-H15
| M380 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Kodak M380
| EX-H15 | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 offers physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Kodak M380 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the M380.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and M380 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The picture below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and M380.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-H15 to provide more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern EX-H15 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsVlogging Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak M380 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak EasyShare M380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak EasyShare M380 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 38-190mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1448s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $160 |
