Clicky

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330

Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
29
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-H15 front
 
Olympus E-330 front
Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 Key Specs

Casio EX-H15
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
  • Released January 2010
Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and E-330 (7MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and E-330 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizing.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The EX-H15 was introduced 3 years later than the E-330 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-H15 scores against the E-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus E-330

 EX-H15 E-330 
ReleasedJanuary 2010March 2006More recent by 47 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution461k215kCrisper display (+246k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Casio EX-H15

 E-330 EX-H15 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus E-330

 EX-H15 E-330 
Focus manually More precise focus
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 provides exterior dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus E-330 has dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H15 against the E-330.

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and E-330 is 93 and 65 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and E-330.

As you can see, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-H15 will result in greater detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The younger EX-H15 provides an edge in sensor technology.

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-330 Portrait photography highlights
35
you can focus manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
54
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
MP count low (7MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H15 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-330 as a Street photography camera
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
60
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than average (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Sports photography info
Olympus E-330 Sports photography info
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Travel photography info
Olympus E-330 Travel photography info
64
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
50
lighter than average (616g)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (7MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-H15
Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
46
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
missing Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-330 Vlogging highlights
28
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
9
no video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus E-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H15 and Olympus E-330
 Casio Exilim EX-H15Olympus E-330
General Information
Company Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-H15 Olympus E-330
Also referred to as - EVOLT E-330
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Released 2010-01-06 2006-03-18
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 7 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4320 x 3240 3136 x 2352
Maximum native ISO 3200 400
Maximum enhanced ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.7 -
Number of lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of screen 461k dots 215k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.47x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 161g (0.35 lb) 616g (1.36 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $300 $1,100