Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
96 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the FE-5010 (12MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H20G was announced 21 months later than the FE-5010 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-H20G grades versus the FE-5010 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus FE-5010. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus FE-5010
| EX-H20G | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 21 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Casio EX-H20G
| FE-5010 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus FE-5010
| EX-H20G | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G comes with exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5010 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G and the FE-5010.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and FE-5010 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and FE-5010.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to resolve extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-H20G will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus FE-5010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus FE-5010 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | 130 gr (0.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $130 |
