Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7010
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
94 Imaging
35 Features
18 Overall
28
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 7010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7010 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus 7010, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the 7010 (12MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H20G was revealed 15 months later than the 7010 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-H20G grades against the 7010 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus Stylus 7010. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus 7010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus 7010
| EX-H20G | 7010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 15 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Casio EX-H20G
| 7010 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus 7010
| EX-H20G | 7010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7010 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G features physical measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus 7010 has measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus 7010 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G against the 7010.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and 7010 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7010 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The visual here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and 7010.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger EX-H20G will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7010 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus 7010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus 7010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus 7010 |
| Also Known as | - | mju 7010 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 145g (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $200 |
