Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus Tough-3000
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H20G was brought out 9 months later than the Tough-3000 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-H20G scores vs the Tough-3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-H20G | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 9 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Casio EX-H20G
| Tough-3000 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-H20G | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G has outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G against the Tough-3000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and Tough-3000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and Tough-3000.
All in all, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to provide more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $0 |
