Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
64 Imaging
44 Features
38 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 670g - 131 x 93 x 67mm
- Announced July 2005
- Alternate Name is Dynax 5D
- New Model is Sony A100
Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Konica. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and Minolta 5D (6MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and Minolta 5D (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was introduced 5 years later than the Minolta 5D and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Konica Minolta 5D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-S200 scores versus the Minolta 5D in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Konica Minolta 5D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Konica Minolta 5D
EX-S200 | Minolta 5D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2010 | July 2005 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Konica Minolta 5D over the Casio EX-S200
Minolta 5D | EX-S200 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Konica Minolta 5D
EX-S200 | Minolta 5D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-S200 has exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Konica Minolta 5D has proportions of 131mm x 93mm x 67mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-S200 vs the Minolta 5D.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and Minolta 5D is 96 and 64 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and Minolta 5D.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-S200 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-S200 will resolve greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The newer EX-S200 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Konica Minolta 5D Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Konica |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D |
Alternate name | - | Dynax 5D |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2005-07-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 131 x 93 x 67mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 58 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 605 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-120 | NP-400 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $1,100 |