Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-S200 was released 4 years prior to the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-S200 grades vs the TG-850 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| EX-S200 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Casio EX-S200
| TG-850 iHS | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | August 2010 | Fresher by 42 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
| EX-S200 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 comes with outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-S200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-S200 versus the TG-850 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and TG-850 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S200 and TG-850 iHS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-850 iHS to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-S200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2014-01-29 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1/2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-120 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $250 |