Clicky

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-S7 front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Casio EX-S7
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 121g - 97 x 57 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2010
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-S7 (12MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the EX-S7 (1/2.3") and E-300 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-S7 was launched 5 years later than the E-300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S7 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-S7 matches up against the E-300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S7 over the Olympus E-300

 EX-S7 E-300 
RevealedFebruary 2010January 2005More recent by 63 months
Display size2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Casio EX-S7

 E-300 EX-S7 

Common features in the Casio EX-S7 and Olympus E-300

 EX-S7 E-300 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-S7 has got outer dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Olympus E-300 has sizing of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S7 versus the E-300.

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S7 and E-300 is 96 and 67 respectively.

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The visual underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-S7 and E-300.

Plainly, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-S7 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Casio EX-S7 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-S7 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S7 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-300 Portrait photography advice
27
focusing manually
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-S7
Street photography with Olympus E-300
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S7 Sports photography features
Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S7 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
52
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
45
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S7 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
28
focusing manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Timelapse mode
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (1.8 inches)
no liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
no Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-S7 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
22
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
9
can't record video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S7 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S7 and Olympus E-300
 Casio Exilim EX-S7Olympus E-300
General Information
Brand Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S7 Olympus E-300
Alternate name - EVOLT E-300
Type Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2010-02-21 2005-01-10
Body design Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 8 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 3264 x 2448
Maximum native ISO 1600 400
Maximum enhanced ISO - 1600
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Amount of lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 1.8"
Screen resolution 230k dot 134k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.20 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121 gr (0.27 pounds) 624 gr (1.38 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 57 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $140 $800