Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-Z16 was released 5 years earlier than the TG-4 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z16 scores against the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Olympus TG-4
| EX-Z16 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Casio EX-Z16
| TG-4 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 55 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Olympus TG-4
| EX-Z16 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z16 provides outside measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z16 vs the TG-4.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and TG-4 is 99 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z16 and TG-4.
As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-4 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 0k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $100 | $379 |
