Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally referred to as EasyShare Max
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the Z990 (12MP) is very comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-Z2000 was revealed 12 months earlier than the Z990 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the Z990 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Kodak EasyShare Z990. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Kodak Z990
| EX-Z2000 | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Z990 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Kodak Z990
| EX-Z2000 | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 features physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z990 has sizing of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the Z990.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and Z990 is 95 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The picture here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and Z990.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z2000 to provide greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
| Otherwise known as | - | EasyShare Max |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 445 gr (0.98 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $299 |
