Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-620
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-620 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-620, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the E-620 (12MP) is very well matched but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and E-620 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe EX-Z2000 was announced 7 months later than the E-620 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the E-620 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-620 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-620. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Olympus E-620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus E-620
EX-Z2000 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 7 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Casio EX-Z2000
E-620 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-620
EX-Z2000 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus E-620 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-620 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the E-620.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and E-620 is 95 and 71 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and E-620.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will resolve extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z2000 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-620 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus E-620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus E-620 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 7 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.48x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $799 |