Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
85 Imaging
56 Features
78 Overall
64
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-PL9, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the E-PL9 (16MP) is very close but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was brought out 9 years earlier than the E-PL9 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the E-PL9 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus E-PL9
EX-Z2000 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Casio EX-Z2000
E-PL9 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | January 2010 | More recent by 98 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 461k | Sharper display (+579k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-PL9
EX-Z2000 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-PL9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the E-PL9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and E-PL9 is 95 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and E-PL9.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-PL9 will provide you with more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.6 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 380g (0.84 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $599 |