Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
Portability
85
Imaging
56
Features
78
Overall
64

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Revealed February 2018
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-PL9, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the E-PL9 (16MP) is very close but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 9 years earlier than the E-PL9 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the E-PL9 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus E-PL9

 EX-Z2000 E-PL9 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 E-PL9 EX-Z2000 
RevealedFebruary 2018January 2010More recent by 98 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k461kSharper display (+579k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-PL9

 EX-Z2000 E-PL9 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-PL9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the E-PL9.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and E-PL9 is 95 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and E-PL9.

As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-PL9 will provide you with more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-PL9 Portrait photography highlights
35
manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
73
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Street photography with Olympus E-PL9
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
84
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
offers focus by touch
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Sports photography with Olympus E-PL9
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography advice
62
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (152 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
77
connects via bluetooth
offers focus by touch
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
does not posses selfie friendly display
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL9
47
manual focus
fairly wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse function
80
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z2000
Vlogging with Olympus E-PL9
28
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
35
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus E-PL9
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Olympus PEN E-PL9
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Olympus PEN E-PL9
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-01-06 2018-02-08
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 64 200
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Available lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Max quiet shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shutter rate - 8.6 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 7.60 m (at ISO 200)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152g (0.34 lbs) 380g (0.84 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $0 $599