Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus 6000
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus 6000, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and 6000 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 7 months later than the 6000 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the 6000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus 6000
| EX-Z2000 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| 6000 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus 6000
| EX-Z2000 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus 6000 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Olympus 6000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the 6000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and 6000 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and 6000.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z2000 to provide extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The younger EX-Z2000 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $0 | $259 |
