Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-Z2000 was launched 24 months before the TG-320 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the TG-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Olympus TG-320
| EX-Z2000 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| TG-320 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Olympus TG-320
| EX-Z2000 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the TG-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and TG-320.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of photos though you should always consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $0 |
