Casio EX-Z29 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z29 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z29 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z29 versus Fujifilm F200EXR, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is very similar but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") come with different sensor sizing.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-Z29 was revealed at a similar time to the Fujifilm F200EXR and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z29 grades against the Fujifilm F200EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z29 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-Z29 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-Z29
| Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-Z29 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2009 |  | April 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 features external dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z29 versus Fujifilm F200EXR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z29 compared to the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z29 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 95 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z29 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm F200EXR will offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z29 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-03-03 | 2009-04-30 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $79 | $350 |
