Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-810
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Olympus TG-810, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks SuggestThe EX-Z35 was manufactured 18 months prior to the TG-810 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the TG-810 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Olympus TG-810. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Olympus TG-810
EX-Z35 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-Z35
TG-810 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 18 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus TG-810
EX-Z35 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z35 versus Olympus TG-810 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 and the TG-810.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and TG-810 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and TG-810.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-810 to deliver more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus TG-810 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-02-21 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 215g (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $99 | $428 |