Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
88 Imaging
53 Features
37 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Launched September 2010
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 7 months earlier than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-Z35 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Casio EX-Z35
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2010 | February 2010 | Fresher by 7 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-Z35 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specs. The photograph below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 provides the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh more difficult. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 140g (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-82 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $99 | $566 |