Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A99
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
57 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
- Revealed December 2012
- Replaced the Sony A900
- Successor is Sony A99 II
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A99 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z35 versus Sony A99, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and A99 (24MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and A99 (Full frame) possess different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was launched 3 years prior to the A99 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A99 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the A99 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A99 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Sony SLT-A99. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Sony A99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sony A99
EX-Z35 | A99 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A99 over the Casio EX-Z35
A99 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | February 2010 | More modern by 34 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony A99
EX-Z35 | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A99 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony A99 has sizing of 147mm x 111mm x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z35 versus Sony A99 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the A99.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and A99 is 96 and 57 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A99 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The picture below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and A99.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony A99 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A99 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony SLT-A99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony SLT-A99 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2012-12-12 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 19 |
Cross type focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | 812 gr (1.79 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 89 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1555 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Retail cost | $99 | $1,998 |