Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-Z90 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth FilmingThe EX-Z90 was unveiled 8 months after the M320 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z90 being a Compact camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z90 grades versus the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Kodak M320
EX-Z90 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2009 | January 2009 | More modern by 8 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z90
M320 | EX-Z90 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Kodak M320
EX-Z90 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z90 features physical dimensions of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has proportions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z90 and the M320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z90 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z90 and M320.
Clearly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z90 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Casio EX-Z90 will result in greater detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z90 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-08-18 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-60 | KLIC-7001 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $150 | $39 |