Clicky

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z90
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
  • Announced August 2009
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Overview

Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-Z90 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

The EX-Z90 was unveiled 8 months after the M320 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z90 being a Compact camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z90 grades versus the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Kodak M320

 EX-Z90 M320 
ReleasedAugust 2009January 2009More modern by 8 months
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z90

 M320 EX-Z90 

Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Kodak M320

 EX-Z90 M320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z90 features physical dimensions of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has proportions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z90 and the M320.

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z90 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z90 and M320.

Clearly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z90 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Casio EX-Z90 will result in greater detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z90 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
27
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
19
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
MP count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
no RAW support
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 as a Street photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
55
lighter than competition (121 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.5")
no RAW support
heavier than competitors (155g)
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 Sports photography details
Kodak M320 Sports photography details
17
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
no phase detect autofocus
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 Travel photography factors
Kodak M320 Travel photography factors
56
lighter than competition (121 grams)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
50
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (155 grams)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 Landscape photography advice
Kodak M320 Landscape photography advice
28
you can focus manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z90 Vlogging information
Kodak M320 Vlogging information
25
lighter than competition (121 grams)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic jack
heavier than competitors (155g)
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z90 and Kodak M320
 Casio Exilim EX-Z90Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare M320
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-08-18 2009-01-08
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing range 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121g (0.27 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-60 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail price $150 $39