Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M340
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M340 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Kodak M340, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the M340 (10MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR100 was brought out 2 years after the M340 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Kodak M340 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the M340 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M340 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Kodak EasyShare M340. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Kodak M340
| EX-ZR100 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| M340 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak M340
| EX-ZR100 | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak M340 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Kodak M340 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the M340.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and M340 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The image here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and M340.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR100 to resolve more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR100 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lb) | 115 gr (0.25 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $130 |
