Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M380
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M380 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak M380, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the M380 (10MP) is very well matched and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR100 was released 2 years later than the M380 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Kodak M380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR100 scores against the M380 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M380 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Kodak EasyShare M380. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Kodak M380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Kodak M380
EX-ZR100 | M380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 31 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Casio EX-ZR100
M380 | EX-ZR100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak M380
EX-ZR100 | M380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 has got outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak M380 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR100 and Kodak M380 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the M380.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and M380 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and M380.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR100 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR100 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Kodak M380 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare M380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Kodak EasyShare M380 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 38-190mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1448 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $300 | $160 |