Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-520
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus E-520, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the E-520 (10MP) is pretty similar but the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and E-520 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 2 years later than the E-520 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-ZR100 scores vs the E-520 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus E-520. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus E-520
| EX-ZR100 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | August 2008 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| E-520 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus E-520
| EX-ZR100 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 comes with external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus E-520 has dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus E-520 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR100 versus the E-520.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR100 and E-520 is 92 and 68 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and E-520.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR100 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR100 will offer you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR100 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus E-520 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2008-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 3 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 45 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 gr (0.45 lb) | 552 gr (1.22 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $400 |
