Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
54 Imaging
62 Features
93 Overall
74
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and E-M1X (20MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and E-M1X (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR100 was revealed 8 years earlier than the E-M1X and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR100 matches up vs the E-M1X with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus E-M1X
EX-ZR100 | E-M1X |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Casio EX-ZR100
E-M1X | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | July 2011 | Fresher by 91 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 461k | Crisper screen (+576k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus E-M1X
EX-ZR100 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR100 has got outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1X has proportions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the E-M1X.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR100 and E-M1X is 92 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR100 and E-M1X.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR100 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M1X will deliver extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2019-01-24 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lbs) | 997 grams (2.20 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 870 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | Two |
Retail cost | $300 | $2,999 |