Clicky

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
53
Overall
45
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front
 
Fujifilm X-T200 front
Portability
80
Imaging
70
Features
87
Overall
76

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2012
Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Introduced January 2020
  • Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T100
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm X-T200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-ZR1000 was released 8 years before the Fujifilm X-T200 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 grades vs the Fujifilm X-T200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Fujifilm X-T200

 EX-ZR1000 Fujifilm X-T200 

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Casio EX-ZR1000

 Fujifilm X-T200 EX-ZR1000 
IntroducedJanuary 2020September 2012More recent by 89 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen size3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution2780k461kCrisper screen (+2319k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm X-T200

 EX-ZR1000 Fujifilm X-T200 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with external dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Fujifilm X-T200 has measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm X-T200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the Fujifilm X-T200.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm X-T200 is 90 and 80 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The photograph below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm X-T200.

Plainly, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR1000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Fujifilm X-T200 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-ZR1000 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography details
Fujifilm X-T200 Portrait photography details
44
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides face detection focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
82
manual focus
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography information
Fujifilm X-T200 Street photography information
68
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (255 grams)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
78
fully articulated screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
supports focus via touch
no image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Sports photography camera
Fujifilm X-T200 as a Sports photography camera
51
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery pack (470 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
70
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
not so great battery pack (270 per charge)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography features
Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography features
70
good battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than competitors in class (255g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
79
connects via bluetooth
supports focus via touch
megapixel count good (24MP)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery pack (270 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Landscape photography camera
Fujifilm X-T200 as a Landscape photography camera
52
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good battery pack (470 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
73
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
screen larger than average (3.5")
megapixel count good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no image stabilization
not so great battery pack (270 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging advice
Fujifilm X-T200 Vlogging advice
34
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (255g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
79
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
comes with face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
comes with mic support
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR1000 and Fujifilm X-T200
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000Fujifilm X-T200
General Information
Make Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 Fujifilm X-T200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-09-25 2020-01-22
Physical type Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 51200
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 425
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Fujifilm X
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Total lenses - 54
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fully Articulated
Display size 3 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of display 461k dots 2,780k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.62x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Max quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 8.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 7.00 m (at ISO 200)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 255 gr (0.56 lb) 370 gr (0.82 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photographs 270 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 NP-W126S
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $572 $699