Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth FilmingThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 8 months after the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR1000 scores against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-ZR1000 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | February 2012 | Newer by 8 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-ZR1000 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 features physical dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 90 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The image here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact resolution but not the same sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR1000 offers the smaller sensor which will make obtaining bokeh harder. The younger EX-ZR1000 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-25 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lbs) | 550g (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 400 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $572 | $871 |