Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-M10
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Announced March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 II
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus E-M10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the E-M10 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and E-M10 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizes.
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks SuggestThe EX-ZR15 was introduced 3 years before the E-M10 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR15 grades versus the E-M10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus OM-D E-M10. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus E-M10
EX-ZR15 | E-M10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Casio EX-ZR15
E-M10 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | January 2012 | More recent by 26 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 461k | Crisper screen (+576k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus E-M10
EX-ZR15 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 has sizing of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus E-M10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the E-M10.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and E-M10 is 93 and 82 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and E-M10.
As you can tell, both cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR15 has the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF harder. The older EX-ZR15 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2014-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 396g (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $249 | $600 |