Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-50
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
88 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus SH-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the SH-50 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%The EX-ZR15 was announced 12 months earlier than the SH-50 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the SH-50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus SH-50. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus SH-50
EX-ZR15 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Casio EX-ZR15
SH-50 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2012 | More modern by 12 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus SH-50
EX-ZR15 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR15 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus SH-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the SH-50.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and SH-50 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and SH-50.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of images but you might want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus SH-50 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | 269 gr (0.59 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $249 | $300 |