Clicky

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000

Portability
93
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2012
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR15 was released 2 years after the Tough-3000 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the Tough-3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 EX-ZR15 Tough-3000 
ReleasedJanuary 2012January 2010Newer by 25 months
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kSharper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Casio EX-ZR15

 Tough-3000 EX-ZR15 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus Tough-3000

 EX-ZR15 Tough-3000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the Tough-3000.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and Tough-3000 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and Tough-3000.

As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Portrait photography factors
Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography factors
40
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
features face detect focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
21
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 as a Street photography camera
Olympus Tough-3000 as a Street photography camera
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Sports photography info
Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography info
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
features tracking focus
great battery life (325 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
36
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Travel photography info
Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography info
67
great battery life (325 per charge)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
61
environment sealing
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Landscape photography factors
Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography factors
49
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
great battery life (325 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
35
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Vlogging features
Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging features
33
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing mic jack
28
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus Tough-3000
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR15Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
Also referred to as - mju Tough 3000
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2012-01-09 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-196mm (7.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance 2cm 2cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.20 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 176 grams (0.39 lb) 159 grams (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 325 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $249 $0