Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9900
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Nikon S9900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR300 was manufactured 3 years before the S9900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the S9900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Nikon Coolpix S9900. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Nikon S9900
EX-ZR300 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Casio EX-ZR300
S9900 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | May 2012 | Newer by 33 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Nikon S9900
EX-ZR300 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon S9900 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Nikon S9900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the S9900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and S9900 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and S9900.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of images however you should really factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-05-22 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 289g (0.64 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $329 | $300 |