Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed May 2012
Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Announced March 2014
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview

In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus E-M10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the E-M10 (16MP) is pretty similar but the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and E-M10 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR300 was brought out 22 months before the E-M10 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR300 grades vs the E-M10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus E-M10

 EX-ZR300 E-M10 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Casio EX-ZR300

 E-M10 EX-ZR300 
AnnouncedMarch 2014May 2012More recent by 22 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1037k461kClearer screen (+576k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus E-M10

 EX-ZR300 E-M10 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 features exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 has measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") having a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus E-M10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the E-M10.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and E-M10 is 92 and 82 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and E-M10.

As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact MP albeit different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR300 comes with the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field tougher. The older EX-ZR300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-M10 Portrait photography factors
40
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
71
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than competitors (396 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography info
Olympus E-M10 Sports photography info
55
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
includes tracking focus
great battery pack (500 shots)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography information
Olympus E-M10 Travel photography information
71
great battery pack (500 per charge)
lighter than average in class (205g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
67
comes with touch to focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
more heavy than competitors (396 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography advice
52
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
great battery pack (500 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
79
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M10 as a Vlogging camera
33
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic port
33
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (396 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus E-M10
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300Olympus OM-D E-M10
General Information
Brand Name Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 Olympus OM-D E-M10
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-05-22 2014-03-18
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS TruePic VII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 81
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Available lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 461 thousand dot 1,037 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.58x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 5.80 m (ISO100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lbs) 396g (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 72
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 884
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 320 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10))
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $329 $600