Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and 6000 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-ZR300 was launched 2 years after the 6000 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR300 grades versus the 6000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus 6000
| EX-ZR300 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| 6000 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus 6000
| EX-ZR300 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 provides physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus 6000 has measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the 6000.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and 6000 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The image below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and 6000.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR300 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR300 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $259 |
