Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-ZR300 was unveiled 7 months prior to the TG-830 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR300 matches up versus the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
EX-ZR300 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR300
TG-830 iHS | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | May 2012 | More recent by 7 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
EX-ZR300 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 has exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the TG-830 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and TG-830 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and TG-830 iHS.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs although you need to consider the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-05-22 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $329 | $0 |