Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-620
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-620 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus E-620, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and E-620 (12MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and E-620 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizing.
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth FilmingThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 3 years later than the E-620 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the E-620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-620 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus E-620. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus E-620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus E-620
EX-ZR400 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Casio EX-ZR400
E-620 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus E-620
EX-ZR400 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-620 has sizing of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus E-620 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the E-620.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and E-620 is 92 and 71 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and E-620.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR400 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-ZR400 will provide you with extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus E-620 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus E-620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus E-620 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 7 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 45 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.48x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 500 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $799 |